in Canton St. Gallen
9327 Tübach combines a lower-elevation settlement profile, the tax scenario sits 2.8% below the canton median, which makes this postcode notable for shortlist-level tax comparison. With roughly 1'638 residents in the weighted view, the postcode is large enough for a serious comparison without pretending the whole area behaves like one block.
This postcode spans 2 municipalities. That means population and comparison figures should be read as weighted orientation rather than a single official municipal record.
Current conditions and 3-day forecast from Open-Meteo.
How much will you pay here?
ℹ️ Canton-median estimate; see Official calculator ↗
Source: ESTV Federal Tax Administration
Who lives here?
Source: BFS STATPOP 2024
These notes explain how to read the tax and demographic blocks on this page and when the official provider should take over.
51 streets found
Select a street to show its details here.
All public transport stops inside postcode 9327, based on the Federal Office of Transport (BAV) layer on geo.admin.ch.
Top matches for: 9327 Tübach SG Tübach Mörschwil Tübach
St. Gallen's current ranking is led by Marbach and Wildhaus-Alt St. Johann. The next cluster sits just behind, and the spread to the bottom of the canton is modest.
A ranking-first view of the most tax-friendly municipalities in Fribourg, with the current top five, the first real tie in the field, and the canton spread that matters in practice.
Why treating a postcode map like a political map is a massive mistake, and how to read the data correctly.
The piece explains why several postcodes inside one municipality are normal and how to compare them without confusing neighbourhood differences with municipal ones.
The best postcode for a move is rarely just the one with the lowest tax rate. Here is the right order to evaluate a location before you sign a lease.
An estimate on PLZHub isn't just filler text. It tells you when a postcode crosses municipal borders or uses derived data. Here's when you need to pay attention, and when it's mostly a technicality.