Skip to main content
Language
Nationwide rankings

These Swiss postcodes have the largest households

Start with /blog/how-to-use-plzhub-data-and-where-it-stops. That page makes one thing clear quickly: household size is a reading aid, not a verdict.
Updated:
9 June 2026
Read time:
3 min
Share:XFacebookLinkedIn
Swiss city or alpine landscape used as the cover image

What this metric actually means

When you look for postcodes with the "largest households," you might expect to find sprawling, family-heavy suburbs or booming cities. But that isn't how averages work.

The top spots on this list don't belong to Zurich or Lausanne. They belong to tiny, often remote communities where a handful of large families completely skew the math. In our dataset, 6684 Campo Vallemaggia leads the country with an average household size of 2.2. Right behind it are 6685 Bosco/Gurin at 2.14 and 3996 Binn at 2.13.

Map of Switzerland

These numbers are real, but their foundation is fragile. Campo Vallemaggia has exactly 15 households. Bosco/Gurin has 22. Binn has 70. This makes the ranking both fascinating and tricky: it highlights genuine statistical anomalies, but small populations always produce wilder extremes than large ones.

The signals you need to read together

If you look at demographics.avgHouseholdSize in isolation, you are basically reading trivia. To understand a postcode, you have to read that average alongside householdCount and population.

The Family sculpture in the garden of the Palais des Nations in Geneva
Source: Wikimedia Commons, file Family_by_Edwina_Sandys.JPG.

A high average doesn't automatically mean a town is a haven for young families. It could indicate a farming community with multi-generational homes, an area with large shared flats, or just a statistical quirk in a village of fifty people.

Finding reliable comparisons

If you want a more robust picture of household density, compare these outliers to major hubs. For instance, 8001 Zurich, 6300 Zug, and 1003 Lausanne all sit around 2.1 in this dataset. That might sound boring compared to Campo Vallemaggia's 2.2, but a 2.1 average spread across tens of thousands of households tells you much more about a city's actual living patterns than a minor spike in an alpine village.

The limits of the data

Treat this ranking as a starting point. It tells you where households are statistically larger, but it cannot tell you why. As soon as your curiosity turns into a real decision about where to live, you need to step away from the isolated ranking. Dive into the individual postcode pages, look at the local tax profiles, check the commuting times, and consult official cantonal data. PLZHub is built to help you filter your options, not make the final call for you.

What to check first

Horizontal scroll to compare values

PointWhat to check on the pageWhy it helps
Starting point/blog/how-to-use-plzhub-data-and-where-it-stopsSets the reading before the comparison
Useful datademographics.avgHouseholdSize, householdCount, national sortSeparates average, volume, and ranking cleanly
Follow-up pages/methodology, /blog/how-to-evaluate-a-postcode-before-movingAdds context when the ranking becomes a real decision
VerificationOfficial source or calculatorStill needed once it becomes binding

How to read this post

  • Open /blog/how-to-use-plzhub-data-and-where-it-stops first and keep the method in view.
  • Check whether the question is about average household size or just household count.
  • Add only the follow-up pages that make the reading sharper.
  • Confirm the final step with an official source.
Blog

Selected articles from the PLZHub blog