Skip to main content
Language
Household fit

Spot a younger population mix: where the data points to more dynamic postcodes

If you want a younger population mix, the data points straight to 3920 Zermatt and 1022 Chavannes-près-Renens. For larger, more stable postcodes, 1023 Crissier, 8952 Schlieren, and 8001 Zürich also stand out.
Updated:
14 July 2026
Read time:
3 min
Share:XFacebookLinkedIn
View of Lake Lugano in Switzerland

I don't rely on theory here. The table above is a real shortlist pulled straight from data/plz_master.json. It survives a basic reality check: a strong share of 20-39 year olds, very few people over 65, and enough total residents that we aren't just looking at a tiny local anomaly.

Switzerland population pyramid
Source: Wikimedia Commons, file Swiss and foreign born population pyramid of Switzerland in 2021.svg.

The clearest young signals are 3920 Zermatt and 1022 Chavannes-près-Renens. Zermatt has 42% of its population in the 20-39 band and only 12% over 65. Chavannes-près-Renens is even cleaner for everyday reading at 41% versus 10%, backed by 9,276 residents. 1023 Crissier, 8952 Schlieren, and 8001 Zurich are less extreme, but they're more convincing as broad urban signals because their population bases are larger.

That is the core of a dynamic postcode: a large 20-39 share, a small 65+ share, and enough residents for the pattern to hold up. A higher foreign-national share often tags along as supporting context. In this shortlist, that share sits at 57.8% in Zermatt, 57.7% in Chavannes-près-Renens, 45.7% in Crissier, and 46.9% in Schlieren.

Zurich population pyramid
Source: Wikimedia Commons, file Zürich population pyramid.svg.

Age structure alone isn't enough, though. Zermatt is a strong sign of a younger mix, but it's also heavily driven by tourism. Take 3929 Täsch as the counterexample that proves the rule: 37% aged 20-39 and 10% aged 65+ looks young, but only 1,582 residents live there. That is exactly why you should always read standout postcodes alongside their scale and surroundings.

When several nearby postcodes show the same age mix, you're usually looking at a genuinely dynamic area. When a single point stands out, it's often just a new housing project, a campus, or a seasonal effect.

Where the first impression flips

View over central Zurich

Urban density makes a place look young quickly, but you still need to give the data a second pass. A lively centre often sits right next to older residential pockets. The reverse happens too: a quieter postcode can skew young just because of its housing stock or a nearby campus. Think of age structure as a filter, not a final verdict.

How I read the page

I always start with the shortlist, then check if the nearby postcodes support the same picture. That matters a lot in places like 8952 Schlieren, which sits inside a larger Zurich-edge urban pattern, compared to isolated outliers.

Use PLZHub as a reading tool to narrow things down. Once your choice gets concrete, you still need to check official registers and source documents to make the final call.

Real shortlist of postcodes with a younger profile

Horizontal scroll to compare values

PostcodePlaceAge 20-39 %Age 65+ %PopulationAvg household sizeForeign share %
3920Zermatt421276162.157.8
1022Chavannes-près-Renens411092762.157.7
1023Crissier3613108902.145.7
8952Schlieren3514203442.146.9
8001Zürich3514182532.134.7

What the shortlist says

  • Zermatt is the sharpest young signal here at 42% in the 20-39 band, but tourism makes it a special case.
  • Chavannes-près-Renens combines 41% in 20-39 with only 10% in 65+. That makes it the cleanest younger mix in the set.
  • Crissier, Schlieren, and central Zurich are less extreme, but they're more convincing because the base is larger.
  • Täsch shows exactly why small postcodes need caution: 37% in 20-39 and 10% in 65+ looks young, but 1,582 residents is just too thin a base.
Blog

Selected articles from the PLZHub blog